Tuesday, May 26, 2009

How MI5 Blackmails British Muslims

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/exclusive-how-mi5-blackmails-british-muslims-1688618.html
 
*Exclusive:
 
*How MI5 blackmails British Muslims
 
*'Work for us or we will say you are a terrorist'*
By Robert Verkaik, Law Editor, *21 May 2009*
 
[image: Mohamed Aden, 25, who was approached by a fake
postman]
 
*Mohamed Aden, 25, who was approached by a fake postman
enlarge
*
 
Five Muslim community workers have accused MI5 of waging a campaign of
blackmail and harassment in an attempt to recruit them as informants. The
men claim they were given a choice of working for the Security Service or
face detention and harassment in the UK and overseas. They have made
official complaints to the police, to the body which oversees the work of
the Security Service and to their local MP Frank Dobson. Now they have
decided to speak publicly about their experiences in the hope that publicity
will stop similar tactics being used in the future.
 
Intelligence gathered by informers is crucial to stopping further terror
outrages, but the men's allegations raise concerns about the coercion of
young Muslim men by the Security Service and the damage this does to the
gathering of information in the future. Three of the men say they were
detained at foreign airports on the orders of MI5 after leaving Britain on
family holidays last year. After they were sent back to the UK, they were
interviewed by MI5 officers who, they say, falsely accused them of links to
Islamic extremism. On each occasion the agents said they would lift the
travel restrictions and threat of detention in return for their
co-operation. When the men refused some of them received what they say were
intimidating phone calls and threats.
 
Two other Muslim men say they were approached by MI5 at their homes after
police officers posed as postmen. Each of the five men, aged between 19 and
25, was warned that if he did not help the security services he would be
considered a terror suspect. A sixth man was held by MI5 for three hours
after returning from his honeymoon in Saudi Arabia. He too claims he was
threatened with travel restrictions if he tried to leave the UK. An agent
who gave her name as Katherine is alleged to have made direct threats to
Adydarus Elmi, a 25-year-old cinema worker from north London. In one
telephone call she rang him at 7am to congratulate him on the birth of his
baby girl. His wife was still seven months' pregnant and the couple had
expressly told the hospital that they did not want to know the sex of their
child.
 
Mr Elmi further alleges: "Katherine tried to threaten me by saying, and it
still runs through my mind now: 'Remember, this won't be the last time we
ever meet.' And then during our last conversation she explained: 'If you do
not want anything to happen to your family you will co-operate.'" Madhi
Hashi, a 19-year-old care worker from Camden, claims he was held for 16
hours in a cell in Djibouti airport on the orders of MI5. He alleges that
when he was returned to the UK on 9 April this year he was met by an MI5
agent who told him his terror suspect status would remain until he agreed to
work for the Security Service. He alleges that he was to be given the job of
informing on his friends by encouraging them to talk about jihad.
 
Mohamed Nur, 25, a community youth worker from north London, claims he was
threatened by the Security Service after an agent gained access to his home
accompanied by a police officer posing as a postman. "The MI5 agent said,
'Mohamed if you do not work for us we will tell any foreign country you try
to travel to that you are a suspected terrorist.'" Mohamed Aden, 25, a
community youth worker from Camden, was also approached by someone disguised
as a postman in August last year. He alleges an agent told him: "We're going
to make your travelling harder for you if you don't co-operate." None of the
six men, who work with disadvantaged youths at the Kentish Town Community
Organisation (KTCO), has ever been arrested for terrorism or a
terrorism-related offence.
 
They have repeatedly complained about their treatment to the police and to
the Investigatory Powers Tribunal, which oversees the work of the Security
Services. In a letter to Lord Justice Mummery, who heads the tribunal,
Sharhabeel Lone, the chairman of the KTCO, said: "The only thing these young
people have in common is that they studied Arabic abroad and are of Somali
origin. They are not involved in any terrorist activity whatsoever, nor have
they ever been, and the security services are well aware of this." Mr
Sharhabeel added: "These incidents smack of racism, Islamophobia and all
that undermines social cohesion. Threatening British citizens, harassing
them in their own country, alienating young people who have committed no
crime other than practising a particular faith and being a different colour
is a recipe for disaster.
 
"These disgraceful incidents have undermined 10 years of hard work and
severely impacted social cohesion in Camden. Targeting young people that are
role models for all young people in our country in such a disparaging way
demonstrates a total lack of understanding of on-the-ground reality and can
only be counter-productive. "When people are terrorised by the very same
body that is meant to protect them, sowing fear, suspicion and division, we
are on a slippery slope to an Orwellian society." Frank Dobson said: "To
identify real suspects from the Muslim communities MI5 must use informers.
But it seems that from what I have seen some of their methods may be
counter-productive."
 
Last night MI5 and the police refused to discuss the men's complaints with *The
Independent*. But on its website, MI5 says it is untrue that the Security
Service harasses Muslims. The organisation says: "We do not investigate any
individuals on the grounds of ethnicity or religious beliefs. Countering the
threat from international terrorists, including those who claim to be acting
for Islam, is the Security Service's highest priority. "We know that attacks
are being considered and planned for the UK by al-Qai'da and associated
networks. International terrorists in this country threaten us directly
through violence and indirectly through supporting violence overseas."
 
It adds: "Muslims are often themselves the victims of this violence – the
series of terrorist attacks in Casablanca in May 2003 and Riyadh in May and
November 2003 illustrate this. "The service also employs staff of all
religions, including Muslims. We are committed to recruiting a diverse range
of staff from all backgrounds so that we can benefit from their different
perspectives and experience."
 
MI5 and me: Three statements
 
*Mahdi Hashi: 'I told him: this is blackmail'*
 
Last month, 19-year-old Mahdi Hashi arrived at Gatwick airport to take a
plane to visit his sick grandmother in Djibouti, but as he was checking in
he was stopped by two plainclothes officers. One of the officers identified
himself as Richard and said he was working for MI5. Mr Hashi said: "He
warned me not to get on the flight. He said 'Whatever happens to you outside
the UK is not our responsibility'. I was absolutely shocked." The agent
handed Mr Hashi a piece of paper with his name and telephone contact details
and asked him to call him. "The whole time he tried to make it seem like he
was looking after me. And just before I left them at my boarding gate I
remember 'Richard' telling me 'It's your choice, mate, to get on that flight
but I advise you not to,' and then he winked at me."
 
When Mr Hashi arrived at Djibouti airport he was stopped at passport
control. He was then held in a room for 16 hours before being deported back
to the UK. He claims the Somali security officers told him that their orders
came from London. More than 24 hours after he first left the UK he arrived
back at Heathrow and was detained again. "I was taken to pick up my luggage
and then into a very discreet room. 'Richard' walked in with a Costa bag
with food which he said was for me, my breakfast. He said it was them who
sent me back because I was a terror suspect."
 
Mr Hashi, a volunteer youth leader at Kentish Town Community Organisation in
north London, alleges that the officer made it clear that his "suspect"
status and travel restrictions would only be lifted if he agreed to
co-operate with MI5. "I told him 'This is blatant blackmail'; he said 'No,
it's just proving your innocence. By co-operating with us we know you're not
guilty.' "He said I could go and that he'd like to meet me another time,
preferably after [May] Monday Bank Holiday. I looked at him and said 'I
don't ever want to see you or hear from you again. You've ruined my holiday,
upset my family, and you nearly gave my sick grandmother in Somalia a heart
attack'."
 
*Adydarus Elmi: 'MI5 agent threatened my family'*
 
When the 23-year-old cinema worker from north London arrived at Chicago's
O'Hare airport with his pregnant wife, they were separated, questioned and
deported back to Britain. Three days later Mr Elmi was contacted on his
mobile phone and asked to attend Charing Cross police station to discuss
problems he was having with his travel documents. "I met a man and a woman,"
he said. "She said her name was Katherine and that she worked for MI5. I
didn't know what MI5 was." For two-and-a-half hours Mr Elmi faced questions.
"I felt I was being lured into working for MI5." The contact did not stop
there. Over the following weeks he claims "Katherine" harassed him with
dozens of phone calls.
 
"She would regularly call my mother's home asking to speak to me," he said.
"And she would constantly call my mobile." In one disturbing call the agent
telephoned his home at 7am to congratulate him on the birth of his baby
girl. His wife was still seven months pregnant and the couple had expressly
told the hospital that they did not want to know the sex of their child.
"Katherine tried to threaten me by saying – and it still runs through my
mind now – 'Remember, this won't be the last time we ever meet", and then
during our last conversation explained: 'If you do not want anything to
happen to your family you will co-operate'."
 
*Mohamed Nur*
 
Mohamed Nur, 25, first came into contact with MI5 early one morning in
August 2008 when his doorbell rang. Looking through his spyhole in Camden,
north London, he saw a man with a red bag who said he was a postman. When Mr
Nur opened the door the man told him that he was in fact a policeman and
that he and his colleague wanted to talk to him. When they sat down the
second man produced ID and said that he worked for MI5.
 
The agent told Mr Nur that they suspected him of being an Islamic extremist.
"I immediately said 'And where did you get such an idea?' He replied, 'I am
not permitted to discuss our sources'. I said that I have never done
anything extreme." Mr Nur claims he was then threatened by the officer. "The
MI5 agent said, 'Mohamed, if you do not work for us we will tell any foreign
country you try to travel to that you are a suspected terrorist'."
 
They asked him what travel plans he had. Mr Nur said he might visit Sweden
next year for a football tournament. The agent told him he would contact him
within the next three days. "I am not interested in meeting you ever." Mr
Nur replied. As they left, the agent said to at least consider the approach,
as it was in his best interests.
*Related articles*
 
  - **Home Secretary was warned of MI5's 'blackmailing of
Muslims'
  - Exclusive: How MI5 blackmails British
Muslims
  - Pauline Neville-Jones: MI5 must use persuasion – not
coercion
  - Bombings spooked security
services

Posted via email from DesiDiary.Com

OUR MINISTERS IN NEW YORK

Sunday, May 24, 2009

Load shedding and wedding night

"Where I stand" - Article by Imran Khan

Saturday, May 23, 2009

By Imran Khan

It was Goebbels who came up with the brilliant theory that if the government wanted people to follow its policy, it must first instill fear in them and then slap all dissenters with the unpatriotic card. Anyone like me, who disagrees with the current indiscriminate military operation is accused of being a Taliban apologist.

Let me state categorically that I have been against the military operations since the disaster of what was formerly the East Pakistan. From East Pakistan to the present Swat operation, the political mantra has always been “no option but the military”. Successive military operations in Balochistan have only added to the sufferings of the Baloch people, which nurtured the seeds of their disillusionment with the Pakistani state.

When Bush decided to attack Afghanistan in less than a month after 9/11, I opposed this US policy at every forum, including through the print and electronic media. Later, when he ordered the invasion of Iraq, I joined the nearly 2 million marchers in London opposing the Iraq war. It is noteworthy that at the time, over 90 per cent of Americans supported Bush’s Iraq invasion. Today, the overwhelming opinion in the US is that Iraq was a disaster. Moreover, the so-called “good war” in Afghanistan is being lost and its support dwindling.

It is not surprising to see the findings of a Rand Corporation study of the last 40 years of terrorist or asymmetric conflicts, which reveal that only 7 per cent of these conflicts were resolved through military means.

When Musharraf buckled under the US pressure and sent the Pakistan Army into Waziristan, I opposed it in parliament and through the media. Speaking to the editors, Musharraf called me a “terrorist without a beard” – as if terrorism is the sole domain of bearded folk. When the Pakistan Army was sent into Waziristan, there were no militant Taliban in Pakistan. As a result of the Army operation, the tribal social and political structure was destroyed throughout Fata and Malakand, and the vacuum has been filled by nine major militant Taliban groups.

Again, at the time Musharraf commenced military action in Balochistan I opposed it and was accused of backing the “anti-state” elements. Today, what was a movement for Baloch rights and autonomy within Pakistan has morphed into a Baloch independence movement. On opposing the Lal Masjid operation, some of the self-appointed “liberals” accused me of backing the Islamic fundamentalists. But soon most of the indefatigable crusaders for human rights joined the critics of the Lal Masjid operation. More sobering is the fact that there were 60 suicide attacks in the aftermath of the slaughter of the Lal Masjid inmates and a steep rise in extremism. The Swat flare-up is a direct consequence of the Lal Masjid operation.

While discussing my opposition to the current military operation, I must state where I stand politically and ideologically. My political inspiration is derived solely from Quaid-i-Azam, Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the constitutionalist and democrat who believed in the rule of law above all else. My ideological moorings are firmly rooted in the political and spiritual dimensions of Allama Iqbal’s exposition of Islam, which not only liberates society from bondage but also the human soul from material desires – releasing the enormous God-given human potential.

Above all, I am an ardent follower of our Prophet’s (PBUH) example of inspiring the heart and the intellect rather than forcing ideas through the sword – a far cry from what has been happening in Swat in the name of Islam. So on no count can I possibly either support the un-Islamic acts such as beheadings, flogging of women, or forcing a way of life on others, nor am I an apologist for such people – I am only answerable on this count to my conscience and to my God.

As for my opposition to the Malakand military operation, first and foremost I believe that the military option, if it has to be used should always be a last resort. Yet in Swat, the military operation was started barely two weeks after the presidential signing of the accord without alternative political strategies being given a chance. In my opinion, a national conference of all stakeholders, including religious and political parties and groups, particularly those representing Swat, should have been called prior to the operation. A delegation from such a conference should have been mandated to visit Swat and talk reason to the militants and report back to parliament. In other words, every effort should have been made to make the militants abide by the peace deal. All along the political effort, a concerted effort should have been made to gain time to revive civil administration, police, and the paramilitary presence in Swat.

The diehard militants who consistently refused to adhere to peace agreement could have been isolated over time – a key counter-insurgency tactic followed by precise military action to decapacitate the leadership.

Assuming, there was no alternative to the military option, then while it was being planned, arrangements should have been made for the people who were going to be displaced. Sadly, and shamefully, the military operation began suddenly under increased US pressure, timed with Zardari’s US visit and with the least concern for the people of the area.

The unfolding tragedy that is taking place in Swat is mindboggling. To flush out a few thousand militant Taliban, more than two million people have been forced to live in misery in camps not fit for animals in civilised societies. Even more disturbing is the use of heavy artillery shelling and bombing from the air alongside helicopter gunships in areas with significant civilian population. Despite a heavy blackout, the news coming from the war zone tell tales of dozens if not hundreds of innocent civilian casualties.

Given the collapse of governance in the country, can we adequately look after so many displaced people – especially as summer temperatures soar? And for how long? The wheat crop has already been lost. If the IDPs cannot return within two months, the fruit cash crops will be at risk. Hence how will they sustain themselves for the coming year? Perhaps most dangerous is the possibility of IDPs’ anger and frustration that besides resulting in riots may also swell the ranks of the militants.

In such a situation, according to the Army briefing given to the parliamentarians, there is every possibility of the Taliban resurfacing not just in Malakand Division but elsewhere in the country – possibly the urban centres. Can we afford further spread of terrorism in our cities given the precarious security and fragile economic situation? Military action breeds more militancy.

An Army action which has already led to almost 2.5 million displaced countrymen cannot simply be accepted without questions. And, as if we do not already have a crisis, Zardari has declared that the war in Swat is merely the beginning of a wider war, which is likely to engulf other parts of the country. It is time to take stock and stop ourselves from committing collective suicide. What needs to be done is the following:

* The military action unfortunately is already underway but there is no political, particularly governance, strategy which is guiding this operation. That should be the first priority so that the military action does not continue in a political vacuum.

* A clear governance and political strategy that allows the IDPs to return following a swift end to military operation is needed. This strategy should be focused on a system of speedy justice through the Nizam-e-Adl and effective civil administration. The writ of the state and the rule of law go together and this has to be ensured if violent challenges to state and government are to be avoided in the future.

* The military action, if at all, should have been extremely limited in scale and targeted with precision to minimise civilian casualties. Tragically, this did not happen and my fear is that widespread use of aerial weapons would only result in greater civilian casualties, swelling the ranks of the militants. So the military action needs to be revised to focus more on specific targeting and commando action.

Will any of this happen? Unfortunately in the present mood of the ruling elite, this does not seem likely. Instead, we will see increasing military action in the tribal areas as long as the US is in occupation of Afghanistan.

In other words, as long as US troops in Afghanistan are perceived to be an occupying force that is anti-Pushtun and anti-Islam, there will be no peace in this region. We are heading in a fatal direction unless we change our strategy and pull out of this insane war that is sinking us into chaos. The longer this persists, the deeper we will find ourselves in this quagmire and we will confront a deeply divided society.

Finally, my heart bleeds for the poor soldier confronting his own people turned into misguided and brutalised militants and giving his life for a war wrought on him by a corrupt and decadent ruling elite that cannot see beyond the lure of American dollars that have become as much of a curse for this hapless nation as the criminal extremists in our very midst.

----

More:

Imran Khan and Taliban - Article by Naeem ul Haque (Member CEC)

PTI CEC Decleration - Text and Video


Posted via email from DesiDiary.Com